About the game
News
Sign in
Register
Top Players
Forum
11:22
4466
 online
Authorization required
You are not logged in
   Forums-->General game forum-->

[Update] Adventurers' Guild


1|2|3|4|5

Author[Update] Adventurers' Guild
i don't know what admin think..but one think i am sure they introduced 2 guild not encourage crampers. adv guild give you too much exp compare to guild point
this counting may be correct,but relative,also rewards
i fought lot of campaigns and i cannot say,i m in debt

it is very usefull for comparison which faction is stronger and also for learning how to play each faction,or which faction fits you better

its like every other guild,you can play it, or not

true is what Selfist said,they create new guilds,but decreasing quality and quantity in pvp
but do we have too much guild here?
nor have time in one chunk to do pvp (they last sooo much longer),

Almost all the duels are fast, very fast...
for Vengeful Spirit:

That may very well be true, but group battles are very very slow, and in CG that is all you get. There is no guild promoting 1 vs 1 battles other than indirectly (thieving and rangers).
but group battles are very very slow, and in CG that is all you get.

What? when did you last click on CG.. there are duels in cg you know..
lol, my bad - but group battles are very very slow, and in CG that is all you get.

What? when did you last click on CG.. there are duels in cg you know..


I think I tried it a couple of times a while back, but got no opponent, and then forgot that it existed and thought it had been axed with the other CG options which there were when it first came out. At that time I was playing as classic wiz, and every battle is slow unless you lose, then it is fast! To be honest I can see why they favour might, simply on a time per battle basis, even if part of me doesn;t like it.
Just realised that you only need to beat the medium level once, to allow you to do it on hero with any faction, this is good as means if you have a full castle then a potion of skill should make you competitive to be able to beat the hero level without having to grind the lower levels
@ Corey

Did you use Google Translate?
for SirReal:
Yes I did, that's why the translation seems a little muddled.
It seems a very small bonus for a lot of extra effort and management overhead. I'd rather just make sure I enroll in a facility that has a high basic wage even if I have to "buy the job". Long term all that matters is improving our LG and earning lots of gold and this doesn't seem to be that useful for that.
Sorry, posted the above in wrong thread. Plz delete
For those worried about this guild forcing people to play, I wouldn;t worry, the community has mostly voted with its feet.

You can now sort on the stats page for adventurers guild http://www.guildofheroes.ru/players.php?levelst=1&levelfin=21&male=1&female=1&sort=22&napr=1&cla n_id=-1&submit=search...&nick=

As of the posting of this message there was one person on AG level 2, and 24 on LG level 1 (most of which are level 20 or 21, so not likely to affect many of us directly). Thats it from the whole community, so not many people getting th ebonus yet. Obviously time may change things, as certainly more campaigns would, but at the moment, not many getting any stat benefits from AG.

While here, congrats to CreatorofWidows and Avelox for being one of the few AG level 1 people!
@ Corey

I believe an official news piece is coming soon because I've already translated it :) Unfortunately, I'm not in a position to share it publicly on my own.
For those worried about this guild forcing people to play, I wouldn;t worry, the community has mostly voted with its feet
From my point of view as .com player it is hard to vote other way if quests are not even translated to English.
what vote?
If I understand Lord MilesTeg well, he means that people don't like that guild and as a proof you can check official statistics. That lack of interest is like "voting" :)
for Lord MilesTeg:

For those worried about this guild forcing people to play, I wouldn;t worry, the community has mostly voted with its feet.

Unfortunately, I disagree. If you closely observe the list, the players who have achieved AG 1 and AG 2 also happen to have a very high GPC i.e. they are at the top of their respective levels.
This is understandable since high GPC means having higher guild levels.
Question is: Is it easy to go from HG 7 to 8 or LG 8 to 10 or MG 7 to 8 to get bonus attack, defense or primary parameter respectively or just level up AG from 0 to 1?

In this scenario, levelling up AG is more cost efficient, time efficient and logical according to me.

Obviously, the high GPC players would level up this guild to improve their GPC further which would introduce a problem analogous to rich vs poor, only here the strong players will get stronger and weak players will become weaker.
This guild makes no sense whatso ever. With main faction is HARD but after losses doable. With sub factions... I lost 8 times as a tribal and STILL can't win one of those battle's because it is just impossible to reach (portal enemy). Why waste time/money on this?

Waste of time guild it is.
for MarineBiologist:

I can see your point in terms of its potential to further seperate out the richest and best that little bit futher, however my point was simply that these are by far and away the minority, the liklihood of being in a direct fight with these is limited, perhaps they may dominate tournies, though with the new style on many of these this impact is lessened as well.

In short 26 people out of the total population is not significant. With more campaigns and time the number on AG1 will rise, though equally so will the ability to get AG1 without having to go out of your main, or posssibly with 2 fully built castles and a skill potion.


Also while you pick out the high GPC ratio, I would focus more on the combat level

so numbers for each CL - 21 = 7
20 = 6
19 = 2
18 = 5
17= 1
16 = 2
15=2
14=0
13=1

there are only 13 with AG1 or more with a CL less than 20, since CL20+ is already pretty elite in itself I think for the most part this is not forcing people to have to play it, or giving an advantage to so many players as to change the balance of the game. TIme will tell on this one however....
This topic is long since last update and considered obsolete for further discussions.
1|2|3|4|5
Back to topics list
2008-2024, online games LordsWM