Forums-->Queries and help-->
| Author | Too much Luck Favoring Enemy |
|---|
https://www.lordswm.com/war.php?warid=799795276
Please look at this combat, the enemy was having 2 luck but still got so many consecutive Luck fall, I mean seriously what's that? | Wow, like 6-7 Lucks in a row hahah.
Like what are the odds of that happening, 1-2%? Lol.
You got quite unlucky there Imo.
Seriously though:
You gotta take into account that Luck and Morale are calculated independently per Stack.
Every Stack lowers and increases its chance of triggering those or not.
I mean, you wont ever see someone proc Luck/Morale 5-6 times because of this, but you can see someone proc it a lot of times with different Stacks.
For more Info, if you wanna know about how it exactly works:
- A LWM Daily informative explanation: http://daily.heroeswm.ru/newscom.php?i=luck--morale
- An informative Q&H Thread: https://www.lordswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=2500082
PS: Take into account that "Luck and Chance" are like a 33% of the game, seriously.
I think everyone reading this right now got "Rekt" by a Stack of EFK getting Morale after the first move, or by succesive Non-Stop Lucky attacks.
Sometimes "Strategy" is less important than it seems, and Luck and Morale decide everything. Its sad, but very often its true. | for Ipsen:
Seriously man, I don't know if I played properly or not.
But losing a battle because of such kind of Luck triggers is really irritating | Every Stack lowers and increases its chance of triggering those or not.
Typo: I meant that every Stack in a Battle constantly reduces and increases the chances of making Luck and Morale after triggering them or not triggering them (In order to "Balance" this). | Every Stack lowers and increases its chance of triggering those or not.
Typo: I meant that every Stack in a Battle constantly reduces and increases the chances of making Luck and Morale after triggering them or not triggering them (In order to "Balance" this).
Ya ya understood that. :) | | no |
This topic is long since last update and considered obsolete for further discussions.
Back to topics list
|
