| Author | Underground caves/Dungeon caves |
|---|
here's 24th battle of the 1st ranked for 42000 monks
https://www.lordswm.com/war.php?warid=837824049<=1
i doubt he will play more fights, in that one he lost army strength of about 150k (but gained about 420k from the monks so 270k net gain). But if he keeps on playing he'll lose more than he'll gain |
Is it true that we get the same xp and fsp no matter how big our army is?
What is the point of getting a stronger army if it doesn't help you gain something more. Is it just to try to be high ranked? |
@142
yes it's the same exp and fsp for all battles (i checked my first and 56th) |
| the system keep giving me the "gain little lost a lot" battle. even when play carefully I still lost more than I get. |
I discovered something pretty interesting. If you dont destroy the cage and instead focus on just killing the enemy force the prisoners will still join you at the end of the battle if you won. With the added extra that you dont have to worry about the hostiles killing the valuable prisoner units you want.
So I dont worry about breaking prisoners out of the cage anymore and now just focus on killing the enemies with minimum losses for a maximum rewarding victory. |
I discovered something pretty interesting. If you dont destroy the cage and instead focus on just killing the enemy force the prisoners will still join you at the end of the battle if you won. With the added extra that you dont have to worry about the hostiles killing the valuable prisoner units you want.
everyone already do that I think, the prisoner have no bonus stats so it is useless anyway if you break it |
any idea to get some arts for completing all attempts?
Found that the more I play, The more I lose (even if win) |
I have gone for a shooter build with two melee for blocking and counter attacks etc.
I then only choose armies where I can dominate - avoiding any where there are troops that do magic damage which will ignore my superior defence, so proportionally hurt more, or are very fast or loads of shooters.
I also tend to find weaker rather than stronger - though this is partially due to using the minimum arts. I did one that was a bit more marginal with better arts and the difference was very palpable, mostly due to a sword of cold adding to ranged damage I think.
Consequently I am gradually increasing in army strength, slowly but surely. |
Have already lost hope at this event.
After 35 battles, army strength 2,101 with pretty much nothing fixed about the army. i have to use up troops as i get them.
Each successive battle doesn't seem to take into account the abysmally weak army i have.
10 monks , 93 termagants , 8 pit demons , 233 skeletons, 17 magi , 37 sharpshooters , 43 orcs. I have no idea what even is the strategy with such an army.
HOWEVER. I played with my alt. account. A level 5 one at that and in just 28 battles i've gained a total army strength of 7,044.
But rather than the enemies actually being weaker or something i just played a lot more aggressively.
minimize the number of spare/useless troops which you can't include in the army and aim for more creatures rather than silver.
Now with a total 694 succubi , 3 foul hydras , 9 magma dragons , 22 cave demons and 282 termagants, pretty much anything at that level is a piece of cake, while taking minimal damage. *the foul hydras are there just for a placeholder till i get a troop to replace them *
I wished there was a do-over for this event where you can reset the army and silver rather than continue in this spiral of harder and harder battles with the payout not matching the risk. |
Have already lost hope at this event.
i lost hope long ago, but doesnt stop it being fun :) |
This is probably the best event by far in a long time :)
Unfortunately I couldn't play it because I didn't have gold, but I really liked this concept, it is kinda like real war. You gain troops and resources(like silver) by conquering territories(by winning wars/battles). Also, your troops actually die so when going into a war you have to consider your losses and whether a war is actually worth the losses.
Quite a cool concept. Obviously admins like ALWAYS messed up calculations and couldn't predict how quickly troops would grow, so certainly they will fix it next time. In fact next time the troops gained would be much smaller, and therefore I suppose more realistic.
A lot could be done with this idea, such as somehow making it multiplayer, such as PvP or (P+P)vsE. Also I hope the make the event page a bit better next time, such as refreshing automatically when searching. Also maybe give more of a "story" factor to it. Like they could make a new map like thing in which you gain more territory and build an empire as you conquer more and more enemies... something more "visible" and interesting like that. A lot of potential, or maybe I am just overthinking and expecting too much from the admins. Anyway, glad we didn't get another PoT and they tried something new. |
Total army strength: 6,195
Victories / Combats: 48 / 49
Silver available: 14,450
Silver gained: 78,532
Im done. Cant find what i need. Now just have to wait |
In sscond account.
Total army strength: 14,266
Victories / Combats: 70 / 72
Silver available: 1,109
Silver gained: 102,453 |
Played this too safe.
Total army strength: 4,887
Victories / Combats: 72 / 72
Silver available: 46,985
Silver gained: 147,552 |
for Santremus:
If you have any stacks available you may as well use your silver and upgrade anything you can to give you extra strength. |
for Corey:
All my combats are done and I didn't have enough silver to upgrade my stack of 300 succubi :\
So expensive |
| Can anyone predict what's the bare minimum score that will be given an art? |
Can anyone predict what's the bare minimum score that will be given an art?
very low I guess, so does the dura |
| An estimate? I have 742 right now... do I need more? |
for randomr1:
you are done more than 10 battle, I guess the minimum is 500. |
