| Author | Call of the Elf |
|---|
| i did not avoid castles because of towers, but of insane heroes in it at #6 (was a bit unlucky with my choices). As slayer says, towers first aim for dragons or dryads and do not really much damage. |
This is my wave 70 castel fight with #6th option,
https://www.lordswm.com/war.php?warid=1191889469&show_for_all=L7cfa9d1fb7
In this instance there were no huge shoters/castes across so I controlled units which come out of castle and killed them one at a time.
In case you face huge shoters/mage hero, need to rush forward with Dryads and dragons to kill enemy asap.
Ex: Wave 58 at 6# option.
https://www.lordswm.com/war.php?lt=-1&warid=1190975517&show_for_all=Lea782e396e |
Added army strength: 1,823
Victories / Combats: 72 / 130
Individual place: ~693
Got:
gold: 146,435
HG points: 36
MG points: 36
diamonds: 2
armaments: 80
parts of Heaven dagger: 30
parts of Imperial armour: 20
stacks of LG: 12
parts of stacks of LG: 350
scrolls of calling: 8
Too many loses ;_; |
| Perhaps it's worth keeping in mind that stronger than average players have easier battles than average players irrespectively of skill level. |
| thats just an excuse. 7 months ago i came back to the game and this character was level 13 almost 14. hg 7, lg 7 tg 1, ag0, cg 1, mg 6, when i hit 14 i had UNDER fsp boost for 3/4 of level 14 to just get above the minimum threshold for fsp on 14. if people want a stronger then average character it is achievable. |
| Could it have something to do with chests and fsp backpacks |
| Sorry, I thought you were arguing about player skill level, not grind level. |
| the worst event ever. my only regret is playing it in the first place |
| It's just an experiment to see how people who react to random enemy armies. Probably it's the reason due to which double attempts were given. Guess many more will follow this pattern. |
Could it have something to do with chests and fsp backpacks
Of course it does. No one likes to admit they p2w though |
| for lord fallen: I don't admit it much because I pay and still lose |
Probably it's the reason due to which double attempts were given.
The only explanation i can think of is so that players burn more gold attempting the difficult levels. No matter how good you are, you gotta spam losses like there's no tomorrow.
BD and Lawton did a good job avoiding that trap. I f up and now my only regret is playing it in the first place. |
| BD? |
for virtual_vitrea:
Post #175
https://www.lordswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=2859145&page=8 |
An objective comparison of true skill level can only be made if everyone had exactly the same stats and exactly the same enemies and no room for luck morale or the +/- 1 ini rng
Basically something like chess xD
Agree with Marquis Thornwald
My final stats:
Added army strength: 1,485
Victories / Combats: 72 / 84
Individual place: ~5,150
Got:
gold: 98,801
I’ll probably get a shitty art, but this is good money tbh and I couldnt care less about the score xD
Again, very happy with the event |
I quite liked this event for the few battles I played. Didn't have time to finish as I'm on holiday.
Hope everyone gets good rewards |
A decent score for me, considering how miserable I did in the necromancer event (elf being my favorite fraction helps a lot, I guess :) ).
The 6th levels from around 57 are too hard for me. Wasted most of my attempts there. Switched to 5th levels since then. Too bad I botched my last battle with a stupid mistake and the wrong counts thinking I had one more attempt left :(
Added army strength: 1,858
Victories / Combats: 71 / 144
Individual place: ~630
Got:
gold: 178,931
HG points: 35
MG points: 36
diamonds: 1
armaments: 78
parts of Heaven dagger: 29
parts of Imperial armour: 19
stacks of LG: 11
parts of stacks of LG: 350
scrolls of calling: 8 |
for bp99:
you did good :) congrats! Hope the rewards are good. |
| It has to be a bow for elves surely |
A decent score for me
It's very nice. Well done! |
