| Author | Rise of the Necromancer event |
|---|
| Lmao really funny strat |
so far I am using magic build and got through day 1 without a loss
took the max difficulty for last 4 battles
here's an example:
#8
https://www.lordswm.com/war.php?warid=1125821250&show_for_all=L4c5e63edab
#9
https://www.lordswm.com/war.php?warid=1125829308&show_for_all=L1121e71705
#10
https://www.lordswm.com/war.php?warid=1125844168&show_for_all=L117373ad80
didn't consider the berzerk spell but damn, it looks nice and very helpful
gl all+hf! |
| Good way to pump up my necro resistances |
Is there any penalties for losing? You get 15 attempts and just 10 wins, and the unused attempts don't seem to transfer over, unless they do.
Basically, one could freely attempt the hardest battles repeatedly without fear of missing out, unless these attempts were best saved for later. |
@SwiftBladez
you can get a total of 60 wins within the boundaries of 90 battles, so if you need less to win 60 battles the unused attempts become obsolete.
vice versa |
| OK, looks like there is not much penalty for picking the max enemy every time |
| If you want to reach a good score it is probably very important to pick the hardest difficulty until you hit the wall. If you start with less difficulty you’ll most likely be offered less difficult enemies and your army will not grow fast enough. |
what do you choose:
1 vampire /dreadlordor:
1 legionare, 1 ghoul, 2 poltergeists ? |
| Yea i wish I would've waited for the rules and only did toughest enemy |
| I picked the toughest enemy ALMOST every time. While it's understandable, I won't be pleased if the entire event run is doomed because of choices on Day 1, not picking toughest enemy every attempt. |
| for markec111: 1 vamp |
| I am missing one point (95). I am not sure if I took one easier battle or its different grow of diffucility if you take left max points battle instead of right (which I did in few situations because better troops)... |
https://www.lordswm.com/war.php?warid=1125973805&show_for_all=L589830022a
Losing was never an option ;) |
| 20-0 for now, still a few points behind people who have 3-5 losses because I didn't choose max difficulty every time, hoping there's a way to catch up and they can't keep this being potentially 60-30 P: |
| what 3-5 losses |
does losing a max difficulty battle refresh all the battles?
cuz sometimes the max difficulty is garbage troops |
https://www.lordswm.com/pl_warlog.php?id=7406068
So this person has 237 score and 2 losses, just 1 off the max score currently of 238. I don't the the penalty of losing outweighs the benefit of simply choosing the highest difficulty each time, doesn't seem like it at least. Could lose 3-5 and be around 235 score, higher than me having lost 0 battles but picking a few lower difficulty ones at the beginning. |
| Yes. If you want best troops, you can/should lose intentionally. |
for SwiftBladez: Or you could just keep winning ...
Rised army strength: 238
Victories / Combats: 20 / 20 |
No, you don't get it. I DIDN'T LOSE ANY, I picked a few battles below max difficulty, max reward, so I'm behind automatically, even behind people who lost 3-5 battles. Doesn't seem balanced.
Check my combat log and read better please. |
