| Author | [Event] Smugglers |
|---|
| That 20 % is just gold reward ? Is not 20% TG ang HG points ? |
| in 2 TG bsttles ive done with pouch equipped, ive got less gold then the TG before... i feel this art is bugged |
| The new rings can be found in artifact shop. |
well this art can't get more useless
at least we got new rings |
| Hey guys, do you consider dragon stone to be useless too? Because I don't and this new backpack item gives you 2 stats and 2 ini as dragonstone does |
for Lord MilesTeg:
Absolutely. Those are some amazing scores at the top. |
P.S. The rewards are good.
The Gold + the Robbers Pouch got me 70k in return. Yay! |
this pouch is full of contradiction.
usually non-shop backpack items are mostly used in campaigns or record hunting, but none of them can enjoy the 20% gold bonus. if you use it in ambushing, the cost of artifact looks too expensive compare with other regular shop artifacts. |
at level 17 and tg 8, the gold reward for a successful ambush is about 500, consider a 70% winning rate(it is already higher than most average winning rate), thus the pouch will give us about 70 gold per usage if we use it for ambush. the basic 1a 1d 2ini worth about 50g in thieving, thus the expected cost of artifact would be about 120/u if we use it for ambush.
right now the price in market is 200/u. |
for RevolutionRebel:
Small error in your calculation, you should consider 95% win rate for the art, as tg wins and losses are very predictable, and if I were to equip it I would only equip it in battles I know I have very high chance of winning. Nonetheless I agree, it's too expensive for tg.
for Nowar:
Well what's annoying about this art is as RR said, the only the that seems special at first glance about this art is that 20% bonus... but if you think about it this art can't be used in tg/rg at all, so it is just strange why admins even bothered adding that 20% detail. Secondly dragon stone is slightly better as going by the types of battles these backpacks are going to be used in, 2 att is better than 1 att and 1 def. Still, it's not THAT bad when combined with the gold reward at the end. |
as tg wins and losses are very predictable, and if I were to equip it I would only equip it in battles I know I have very high chance of winning
So you know if you're going to lose a battle?..damn
Or you equip it in middle of battle |
for Fallen Atheros:
Are you being sarcastic? Obviously tg battles are very predictable. Many people lose some tg battles on purpose after they have won a few in a row, and if I lose it with max fsp difficulty should drop significantly. This increases my chance of winning next battle greatly, as remember I could win this particular battle, instead I lost it with max fsp so next battle becomes even easier.
Anyway as I said it doesn't make a difference, even then the art is too expensive to be used in tg/rg. |
Are you being sarcastic? Obviously tg battles are very predictable.
So your plan to make it 95% predictable is to lose some, then win one and then lose few again? If anything, that effort and planning deserves some gold. |
so it is just strange why admins even bothered adding that 20% detail
maybe 3rd campaign has some thieving/ranger stuff included? Probably not but that's just about the only way i see the bonus would make sense |
What would've been great if this would give 20% gold in Defense battles.
TG 20% is just minimal.
Or you equip it in middle of battle
LOL. |
The artifcat makes sense when you think of it with the event, I get the 20% bonus to gold.
The stats and repair cost make sense when compared to something like a dragon stone
However, the economics of it doesn't make sense to use really on a thief unless you would normally equip a backback item, something which I think is a rarity.
IMO it is right that the stats are modest and not a game changer.
Putting all these together I think the % gold bonus for thieving should be a bit higher such that it actually was likely to be used for its intended function (thieving) as opposed to what it probably will be used for which is Survs and adventurers guild battles |
| Notice how none of the rings have any spellpower or knowledge, and by not releasing mage guild 5 they have made wizard obsolete in this game. |
for Lawton:
You do realise they are alternatives to ring of cold?
you see kn sp on ROC? no? |
@Fallen Atheros, so six new rings as an alternative for just one ring? That's ludicrous. It's like creating six new colas as an alternative to pepsicola.
What's next, six new cloaks as an alternative for Cloak of sun? |
| Cloack of sun have fixed stats, stats of RoC have to do with levels, they just tried to cover all levels. |
