| Author | Unjustifiable Penalty. Is travelling not allowed anymore? |
|---|
| Well, I was with overclocker @ 96, now I'm pretty sure he's a cheater. |
Whether it is cheating(real brother or multi) or not, it is not of importance regarding the fine for staged combats. It is still possible for staged combats to be done by 2 different individuals. To say that an effort wasnt made to increase the chance of ambushing a particular player in order to get an easy win is extremely difficult to believe. Now add in the fact that many interactions between both characters have taken place with the vast majority favoring the one character gives much more weight to one side of the issue than the other.
The fine is what is important, it lets you know that the admin (the only opinion that matters) view it as staged combats. Any future interactions risk a banning, legitimate or not. |
#100 and all those who are putting so much passion for the password transfer:
There are players posting on their infos that they gave up their secondaries to different persons. Some of them went to CaA for some other reasons and they are still playing (proved that even those reasons were false). Why do you call a cheater someone who gave a character to some other player, when this is a common feature of this game? And mods, where is now your sense of "off-topic"? Yes, I know, to send to the Secretary which is just a black hole. You all call for justice, but you just want to destroy everything. This is not community, this is "let's become the first in this game by blocking the rest". Disgusting attitude! |
| This game could be really fun to play with other members of the same household. Unfortunately this is often viewed as cheating or supporting, thus interactions between members of the same household or those that play from the same location or connection are advised refrain from that behavior. It is easier for friends or relatives that live in different locations to play and interact. Sad for anyone living or playing from the same location but thats the way it is |
There are players posting on their infos that they gave up their secondaries to different persons. Some of them went to CaA for some other reasons and they are still playing (proved that even those reasons were false). Why do you call a cheater someone who gave a character to some other player, when this is a common feature of this game?
It's not because cheating is common that cheating becomes legit.
Thanks God. |
#105:
And if it became legit, then why players are allowed to call that as breaking the rules? Isn't that a kind of insult as well? |
106
since when telling truth is an insult? Well Truth is an insult only for cheaters... |
#106:
What is the truth here? If you write, probably you were able to read what Kotrin wrote. It became legit to give secondaries to some other players. So, where is the truth in your logic? |
| #108 was for #107. (typo) |
Oh dear, we may have unearthed another support character here. Perhaps this is why CGSMCMLXXV is so touchy about this subject.
CGSMCMLXXV and Anita2008 have a *very* long history of interactions together (mostly smithing). This is hardly suprising since their profiles both claim that they are Boyfriend and Girlfriend.
However their is one important factor that CGSMCMLXXV has forgotten in his dealings with Anita2008. It is the same thing that Commander forgot with his multi, and once you realise what it is, it makes the support blindingly obvious.
The problem is that they are so used to treating their support character with a level of indifference that they would not treat any genuine character. They forget that they are supposed to treat their support character the way they would any other random character. If in fact they are BF and GF, the treatment that CGSMCMLXXV has been giving Anita2008 would be totally unacceptable.
Does anyone want to hazard a guess at what CGSMCMLXXV has forgotten?
Grunge |
108
Is it really legal or u just thought it up right now coz rules clearly say:
3.7. Password transfer to a different user and collective account managing are forbidden
How can it be legal if its forbidden? |
Post 17.
I am not a multi account of my brother. I was at start (you can look at the very first pages, 20 or so, of my transfer log and you will see very good proof for that), but what he did, was undone 2 months ago as i saw what he did at start (please look at page 1 and the date when it was undone).
I was at start = password transfer. The account should be blocked. |
For Grunge:
Feel free to post it in CaA. You will have the same result as the others who did it: nothing. And you know why? Because there is no rule against smithing for 100% repairing cost. And, by the way, you can try to post a complain about maybe we are not BF and GF. Others tried unsuccessfully. Good luck! (For any other accusation, please, post it in CaA.)
#111:
Tell that to Kotrin and admins, not to me. |
BTW, in #105 Kotrin did not claim that giving secondaries to others is in anyway a Legitimate thing to do.
You just chose to interpret his post in that way. If I am not mistaken he is essentially saying "Just because many people cheat does not mean that cheating becomes Legit.".
Please correct me if I am wrong Kotrin.
Grunge |
#112:
Please, read #105. |
| Yes, Kotrin, please, make it clear. Perhaps I interpreted incorrectly. |
I think there should be a rule stating that all characters must be played to their fullest potential.
Because, it is not in a characters interest to send their artifacts for repair.
Especially when it is only 10-50%
Especially when they pay 100% not 10-50%.
The fact that it is for 100% makes it look more suspicious. |
CGSMCMLXXV, Geht is obviously supporting I own. He loses all his card games against him, he fights and loses against him much more often than random could explain. This has be proven very clearly in this thread.
By this I own is getting faster level ups than he could otherwise. This isn't fair play.
People being angry about that are people to whom fair play is important, not people who want others to be blocked at all cost - no matter how often you pretend that. |
For CGSMCMLXXV.
You are right there is nothing in the rules about repairing for 100% cost.
However you have forgotten an important offer that you have made to everyone in your clan and the Public in general.
The relevant forum post can be found here :
https://www.lordswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=1859609
On the 17 of July this year you made an offer to repair artifacts for 50% of the cost. This message has also been referenced in your profile.
Strangely you still receive 100% of the repair charge from your girlfriend (and to a lesser extent Haran). Have you forgotten to mention it to your precious Lady? Or is it because you have become so used to exploiting the other character to your benefit that you naturally didn't even think about applying the discount?
Such an easily overlooked factor. And yet those with a long-term support character still forget it. I wouldn't treat my loved ones in this way, but you don't seem to have a problem with it.
Grunge |
CGS, once again you are trying to cover behind something. His combat log shows what he prefers. To be ambushed by his own brother. There are 13 routes that a player can travel. Ambush takes about 10 minutes to trigger. 24 hours per day, thats about 150 times you have a chance to trigger the ambush.
What are the odds of triggering 4 ambushes in the row with your own brother? By accident?
Some people cheat by accident. You are a cheater, even penalised cheater is still a cheater. You have just changed simple password transfers and gold transfers from multi to a more clever method.
Changing your multi`s name to "brother`s account", staging ambushes and laundering your multi gold through repairs are just cover up. You didnt choose to play fair after penalty.
You are trying to exploit every chance, every loophole, every corner of rules to you unfair advantage. If nothing else, this definition make you cheater. |
