Forums-->Off-game forum--> <<|<|16|17|18|19|20|21|22|23|24|25|26|>|>>
Author | May 21, 2011-End Of The World? |
for Barbarian-Fishy:
Is stand by my statement. What makes up the left and right today is what is relevant to these times we live in.
By looking at ACTIONS of those men, we can place them where they belong today and Chamberlain is a dove and left would have NO problem with his idiocy but the right would utterly reject it as they do today.
Lets look at the current world. The right sees a dangerous problem with Iran getting nukes and would act on it. The left? They want dialogue which in the face of evidence equals appeasement, for the leaders of Iran have consistently said they want war with Israel and the "great Satan" USA.
So while the left wrings its collective hands with useless talks, the threat grows.
You are today's Neville Chamberlain.
And where has that gotten us? More instability. Now the much stronger Iran is flexing its Middle East muscle and leading to confrontation with Saudi Arabia, making our whole system of life in the West very shaky.
Modi logic? Lets try Fishy logic.
You are a native Australian? If you are not, you are an usurper and an occupier and your little voice is irrelevant to Israel. Get out of Australia, then come back here and tell me all about Israel.
lol | I agree with modi.. your opinion doesn't count!
better keep it for yourself mate. | I agree with modi.. your opinion doesn't count!
better keep it for yourself mate.
Er, uh. I'm not the one telling others what they can and cant do with their land, that would be Fishy. Seeing he is a living piece of hypocrisy, unless he is a native Australian, he should be the one to keep his opinion to himself. How can an occupier tell someone else they occupy land? Bwahahaha
Lost? Get a clue. | I wont insist for everything about biblical contradiction, just the one I've asked for since page 5. The genesis contradiction.
Are you a scientist? An astronomer? A theologian? No? But you can use their explanations to draw from when you please, right? So can I.
http://www.tektonics.org/jedp/creationtwo.html
There's a good bit of answer for you and if you don't like that one, I'll send you some more because as I stated already, this subject has been debated for over 100 years.
I think they have covered it all with the result that neither side changed its position as we are both zealots, but only I am able to admit that fact.
To put it in my own words(and don't ask again) the creation account is one account, a broad explanation and a detailed one.
Example. " Hey Modi what did you do this week?"
"Well I went to the gym ,played some LWM, had a birthday for my son, listed stuff on Ebay..."
Modi gets called into court and the prosecutor needs to place him at the scene of a crime.
"So Modi, where where YOU Monday night, the 4th of April?"
"I was listing Ebay stuff,and I why?"
"Aha! He is lying because I have here evidence from his confiscated PC with an email saying he had a birthday party for his son and all sorts of other activities BEFORE he listed Ebay items. NOW he says the birthday was AFTER, the Ebay listings. He is a liar!"
Uh,no Modi was giving a general description of his activities in the email, then a detailed account.
You can also find this very thing with the Law, where the second version details the first.
Now I have answered your question. You don't have to like it and you won't agree with it anyway because your whole point is that you don't even believe in God, let alone being worried about the details.
Have fun | for coolahed:
Shout out to a mate who was being sincere with his post that I took the wrong way. Sorry mate. | for Barbarian-Fishy
If you want to make a point it is always nice to support your view with evidence! just an advice to a mate. | The website name points to the very simple answer.
"Tekton education and *apologetics* ministry"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_apologetics
"Apologists have based their defense of Christianity on historical evidence, philosophical arguments, scientific investigation, and other disciplines."
If you read the text linked to by Modi it quickly becomes apparent that the article premise is based on the Bible being sourced from ordinary people, not "God".
Essentially the person writing the article is working from the simple explanation that I mentioned earlier. The Bible is flawed because it is written by people, not sourced from "divine origins".
Again and again we have seen Modi misleading and misrepresenting his side of the argument. It's like he is unable to recognise what is truth and what is fiction. Perhaps his religious and political indoctrination has rendered him unable to tell the difference?
It will be interesting to see Modi's next example of misrepresentation.
Have Fun
Grunge | Wow, some people are so daft. The Bible is written by man, inspired by God, and that is not even disputed among us.
Clearly if anyone reads the supposed Genesis contradiction, they can see that one account is detailed and in order and the other is not.
After the detailed account we see
"4These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens."
Clearly there is a shift there in narratives.
But as I stated, they don't want answers, they want to throw mud at me.
If you answer each question, another will appear behind it.
As they did with King David..."he never existed" until the name was discovered in 1993, they immediately shifted to..."he wasn't a great king with a united Israel, he was a small tribesman."
We see through your lame attempts.
And please do sign your posts, " from occupied Australia."
lol | While the angry leftists are debating, the ship has already sailed on them but they don't realize it.
Their dangerous and foolish diversity and multiculturalism is an abject failure as we on the right have been saying all along.
The big three EU players, Germany, France, and England, all recently came out and admitted the failure of the idiotic and insane multiculturalism.
Missed it? I didn't. See, politicians are quite fickle and will leave you holding the bag when they see danger in the air. They know that the people have had enough of leftist drivel and will indeed act on their frustrations.
So put on your man-pants if you ever had a pair, because you will join the rest of us, or be trampled under foot.
Here in the States, people laugh when we are called racists now. So abused was that label by the left that they ruined the meaning of the world.
Time to pay the piper, lefties. Gathering storm and all of that. No worries, eh?
Modi( from occupied USA)
lol | "Germany’s attempts to form a multicultural society have “absolutely failed”, Angela Merkel, chancellor, has said in a stark intervention in the country’s increasingly strident arguments about immigration."
"French president Nicolas Sarkozy on Thursday declared that multiculturalism had failed, joining a growing number of world leaders or ex-leaders who have condemned it."
"Prime Minister David Cameron, in a speech attended by world leaders, on Saturday criticized his country’s longstanding policy of multiculturalism, saying it was an outright failure and partly to blame for fostering Islamist extremism."
As we all know, what the big three in the EU want, they get. Seeing a united front on this issue, do you need a hammer over your head to shake you out of your stupor?
No sir, that ship has sailed and those politicians who are against multiculturalism and continued immigration are winning seats in droves. Oops, did I pop your little bubble?
Anyone with a lick of sense can see what's coming. Another dangerous leftist pipe dream gone up in smoke.
I will be smiling from my seat in occupied USA :P | UNITED NATIONS - Britain, France, Germany and Portugal handed the UN Security Council a draft resolution on Wednesday condemning Syria's crackdown on protesters, despite the risk of a Russian veto.
Let me spell it out for the dreamers.
There is an immense shifting of the powers that be and sides are being drawn, plans laid, and propaganda prepared.
All of a sudden we see an EU with teeth, pushing for NATO interventions, drawing up sanctions, aiding in the creation of the worm that gave the Iranians fits with the nuke program.
The smaller Asian nations know they have to deal with a powerful China, and some are quite worried.
Russia feels still an outsider but as long as they get a piece of the Middle East pie, they will go along to get along.
Israel has been used as a front line base for the West in the Middle East, while taking the heat for the dictators there who loved to use Israel to keep their populations not looking at their deeds. It's all coming to a quick end.
All the powerhouses are courting South America and Africa for their resources at the same time.
Where does it all end, I wonder? Time will tell but at least I can read the writing on the wall.
Modi from occupied USA | "The last figure released by the Mexican government on the number of dead during its 4 1/2-year, military-led crackdown on organized crime came in January, at just over 34,000. It covered the period from the start of the drug war in December 2006 until the end of 2010.
Homicides attributed to the drug war continue across the country on a daily basis, and many more violent incidents probably go unreported. Self-censorship is widespread among news outlets in violent states such as Tamaulipas and Chihuahua.
With 2011 nearing its midway point, how many people have been killed in Mexico?
Until May many major international news outlets covering Mexico used the general figure of 34,000 or 35,000 drug war deaths -- while bodies have kept piling up in shootouts or discovered in mass graves by the hundreds. In the border city of Ciudad Juarez alone, for example, at least 976 people have been violently killed in the metropolitan region since the beginning of 2011, reports the tally at Frontera List."
Wow, 35k killed in 4 years? Gee, I wonder why Mexico, aided by the USA is cleaning out the rats nest? Lol, the Southern Mexican border is minute and in our soon to be coming NWO, America will be merged with Mexico.
Also, we have no need for the drug lords now that pot is slowly being legalized here. Cocaine? Already replaced by opiates from our friendly drug stores.
No, it's all a coincidence that they decided to have a fight to the death in Mexico at the same time the world is shifting in front of our eyes. Uh, yeah.
Modi from occupied USA | WASHINGTON — The Obama administration has intensified the American covert war in Yemen, exploiting a growing power vacuum in the country to strike at militant suspects with armed drones and fighter jets, according to American officials.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/09/world/middleeast/09intel.html?hp
Oh say it ain't so! Those behind the ship in the sinking raft of shattered dreams can keep paddling until they expire. The battle of civilizations has been evident for some time now and is being ratcheted up to full throttle.
Even some die-hard leftists have realized the danger. Their statements are all over the net. Only the followers have not realized what is happening because they haven't poked their heads from their basements and ivory towers to stick a finger in the air.
Shortly, all the chatter will be about who is to blame for the mess we are in and those who called the rest of us racist, bigoted, Nazi, xenophobic, Islamophobic, for simply pointing out the problem will run from their failed ideas like they always do.
As we say in the occupied US, " being a liberal means never having to say you are sorry, or wrong." | @408. We are finally getting somewhere. You have put in writing that the bible is written by man, inspired by god and some bits are not right. That's what the whole request for an answer was trying to achieve.
That acknowledgement means that it is fair to question other parts of the bible. While most things I've looked at never question David's existence, let's give you that one for the sake of discussion.
It is fair to question Davids existence, as was that just a broad weeping narrative with much exaggeration or was that the gospel truth of the lord?
How does one choose what is right, and what was poorly recorded by man. Oh, that's right, one cherry picks the parts they want. | | I think you need to understand what left means. You have this caricature evil loony leftist, that you see Grunge and I as, when it's just wrong. From what I can see, you see the right as you, and anything else, as left.
There's the extreme left economically which are the commies. Even distribution of all wealth, at the barrel of a gun if need be. Then there's the left which is more socialism. The poor need to be helped out, and the extremely wealthy need to be part of that helping. That's where I am.
I see the right as thinking that each man deserves to be rewarded for what they can do, and if they get extreme rewards, they deserve it for coming up with a great idea, or whatever got them there extreme wealth.
Since about the 70s, the right economically has been getting stronger and stronger. You only need to look at the GFC. The banks, the cause of the problem, got bailed out, and hardly any rich people lost much money at all, while the taxpayer got shafted. Privatising profit and Socialising loss is very right wing.
When talking Liberal and Conservative, no question, there has been a huge swing to liberalism. It's been less than a century since women got the vote, and now there are multiple countries with women leaders. Slavery gone. Sodomy not illegal. The level of swearing on TV, the easy access to porn, and for Coolahed's benefit some evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-TA57L0kuc
By placing both of those in one mix you call the left, you are missing the big picture. You see the move to liberalism and thus say the whole world has gone left, when it has done so in one area, but shifted right in others. | About occupied Aus. Agree with you. We conquered Australia. We kicked the aborigines of their land. They got shafted. Am I going to give up my house? Not likely.
History is full of winners and losers. America crushed the Indians, and the Spanish and Mexicans. Lost to the Canadians though. Rome conquered the Franks and Gauls and the Carthaginians, etc.
The difference between Aus and Israel, is we treat the Aborigines better now.
http://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/politics/stolen-generations-sorry-apology.htm l
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2011/s3239193.htm
I'm not saying it's fair recompense for taking their country. It isn't, and there's no way in hell we will ever give them anything that can compensate for taking their country, and I don't intend to.
Also, we don't try to take the moral high ground and claim that what we have done was right and that we have a better claim to the land the the people who lived their. We accept we conquered, them, that we used might is right logic. Israel don't accept that.
Fishy writing from Perth, Western imperial Capital of Conquered Australia, sight of the conquered Wagyl. | he easy access to porn, and for Coolahed's benefit some evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-TA57L0kuc
Wrong mate!
The access to pornography is restricted and it is not the government falut when children access it! it's the parents fault when they are not supervising their children..
If you are a father and your children had access to the porn don't blame them! blame yourself for not being there to stop them! as children it is their nature to explore and as a father it is your duty to supervise. When Failing to fulfill your duties you have one person to blame. Yourself! | @418. I was just talking about the move to liberalism, not any personal successes or failings of myself. I could broaden it to talk about artist like Rihanna singing a song like "S&M", Madonna's "like a virgin", etc.
I completely agree that if a child gets access to something the parents disapprove of, then it's the failing of the parent.
I was also going for a bit of humour as Avenue Q are pretty funny. | @408. We are finally getting somewhere. You have put in writing that the bible is written by man, inspired by god and some bits are not right. That's what the whole request for an answer was trying to achieve.
Uh, don't add in stuff I haven't written. "some bits aren't right?" They are your words, boy, not mine.
Nice try |
<<|<|16|17|18|19|20|21|22|23|24|25|26|>|>>Back to topics list
|