| Author | Admins and Players Integration |
|---|
Crackpot, at this point you are simply provoking people to get a reaction, nothing more.
Wonderla, what were the names of your previous accounts you used to apply as a moderator? |
for _CrackpoT_:
I will definetely not gonna ban you,but i when i am having a conversation i expect other people to be nice to me,since you are not i will stop posting about things concerning you and questions you may have
And same happened to me I was level 7 at that time(or 6) a year old account but still rejected even though gave replied to every answer ever asked during that time in Q&A...how am I supposed to believe the system now?
Why do you think other people were worse than you,how much time your help and your activity lasted? |
for MrBattleControl:
I publicly apologize for being rude to,I truly am...I hope you can forgive my foolishness and I was a camper one year of camp each day 6 enrolls and one hunt after lvl 5 with one mg and occasional PvP and had 800k(+) but after level 6/7 I stopped fighting and just answered Q&A questions and enrolled and Taverned...now if you will be kind enough then tell my dear friend why was I not even(if) given a fair chance even after so much activity...and I was quite known though not like Jedi or Laitha or Antos or MasterTi or alyna among circle I was known that is until I had to leave the game due to frustration ... |
for Classic Dyna:
Iamtheworldking |
There are a number of minimum requirements specified normally during recruiting. CL is one of these as many parts of the game are only possible at higher levels.
As long as you meet the minimum number of these requirements specified then you will be considered. So if someone met all the other but had a lower CL then they could still pass this stage but common sense would dictate that someone who met them all would have an advantage at this stage.
If you don't meet enough of the requirements or follow the simple instructions given and still apply then you are demonstrating a failure to understand the instructions given which speaks for itself and no further questions are needed imp. |
And by looking at my LG , you can see that i enrolls about 12-13 times per day , which means im Active.
But still I will be rejected , just because my account is created a month ago?
So 'Creation of Account' is given more priority over 'Knowledge related to Job' ??
Or its like , newcomer should not be given a chance at all?
I do personally feel that CL should play an important aspect in the recruiting process. Would you rather hire someone whom has been playing for some time (loyal) compared to someone whom has just created "a month ago"? Its not that newcomers are not be given a chance, but honestly you don't expect to be promoted just because you're knowledgeable ONLY. IMO you got to be knowledgeable as well as having a pretty decent CL.
Being smart and knowledgeable doesn't automatically entitles you to anything.. |
| imp = imo (in my opinion) silly phone auto correct lol |
Unfortunately Crackpot, the time back when somebody like MasterTI (whom I was also friends with) was a very long time ago. We don't typically keep applications from that long ago, and we can't really judge what we were looking for vs what you were offering.
We simply don't have an answer, the moderator clans were managed by different people and I personally don't recall everyone who was active at that time. Although we do understand you're frustrated, and we admit we aren't perfect humans, that isn't a reason to give up and decide to argue against the moderators. |
for _CrackpoT_:
I am not a recruiter so i will only reply with what i believe is true
If what you stated were true
Scenario 1:Your time zone wasn't what the recruiter was looking for.Even now there are some hours of the day that many mods are online and if something occurs it is being dealt fastly,while there are some other hours that not many mods are able to face any possible problems
Scenario 2:Your time zone was alright but the people that was finally recruited were even better than you.
Do you really think that official clans recruiters have something against you and they don't like you,they were assigned to do the recruiting because they have shown love for the community and willingness to help the best they can. |
for DEATHisNEAR:
Yes true and I totally respect that.
But the point is , why 'Combat Level' , 'Date of Account creation' is given more priority over 'Knowledge regarding job' ? Just why? just want to know a valid reason behind it. Its not that im complaining , but i m just curious and would like to know.
CL is one of these as many parts of the game are only possible at higher levels.
Like what?
I dont think there is anything in this game which is done only by high level players? now its obvious that all those applied is atleast over lvl 5.
Now whats that thing which lvl 5 won't be able to do , which a lvl 15 can do? And how that thing(if any) is related to moderation ( the thing for which we are being recruited ). |
| Ambushing and CG as 2 quick examples. |
Lvl 6 player can ambush , lvl 9 player can play CG.
But hows its related to moderation anyways? :O
If you can ambush or play CG does it mean , you can handle the forum in better way? o.O |
Maybe I am wrong but there was a time when dominance over clans was an unspoken rule by one person whose name I would rather not take who was then thrown by third wave of Arctics revival his name started with 'C' and I know those who are as old as me in this game know what I am talking about.
He practically controlled the game for a long time and was ousted after a fierce battle(not literal) I just wish people like me who have experience and knowledge but not time with the moment are given due consideration when time comes... |
| I never said any of these things took priority but it is a part of the overall package. And knowledge of the game is very important as people often take moderators replies in forums above others either correctly or incorrectly but most of us are just human too. |
It means you can answer certain questions when they pop up, which is why the minimum level of applicants rise every session (Started at three, then 5, and I think the most recent was 8).
Again, in the past there wasn't a huge emphasis on level, and there were exceptions made (normally when a moderator would approach you after seeing how helpful you are). |
| I think in the end we all agree changes are needed... just time will tell if people win or peoples will |
Crackpot, I'm assuming you're referring to Cantbstopped.
At the time, his actions may have been viewed as... somewhat harsh, but he was the only administrator level presence we had at the time. Without him the game would have been littered with cheaters. It's a similar situation to now, where we don't have an Arctic, so the moderators need to step up a little bit (which has happened numerous times in the past), and the community has become upset as a result.
There may be some changes required, and a discussion is being held as we speak about it, but don't expect huge changes in the immediate future. These things take time and power, and it seems we're short on both :P |
|
The reason we don't typically allow public discussion on moderator action is because we would have one of these topics every week. As stated earlier, moderators to talk to each other about issues, and when we receive complains we ensure we get to the bottom of them. If there are any issues you currently have with moderators you can message a staff member (even myself), and we will ensure it is handled appropriately.
The selection process is set out and very simple. It's efficient and easy to get your head around. Unfortunately, when somebody doesn't get selected they get (understandably) frustrated and try to come up with crazy theories as to why this happened. There isn't a plan to ban everyone in the community, we don't ban people simply because we dislike them, and we follow the rules within reason where required.
Honestly, I don't have a huge problem with the way things are handled at this point. The forum hasn't exploded and we can still have a (somewhat) civil discussion about these things. There are some issues here and there that may need to be discussed with management, but it's something we can all live with. |
| The process is easy but not transparent...reasons should be given for selection and rejection |
