| Author | Losing battles intentionally should be stopped |
|---|
60
try your best way to beat others, instead of forbidding others growing. |
61
"try your best way to beat others"
good luck on that in a tournament
try your strategy on this:
at combat level 3
agaist 200+ skelletons
or against +10attack+10defence+6hp gargles
unless,
"your best way" means joininy losers't rank
:)
no offence intended to you, but
it's not forbidding others growing,
RATHER, it't forbiding others growing by intentionally losing. |
for Viconia:
+1.
(9voltz - its me.) |
| Again :) |
+1 for Robai
Winning should give more skillpoints then losing
-1 for Vicionia
Stop the bullcrap, youll never be the best player in this game, and you ll never win a tournament hahaahah |
+1 for Vicionia:
Thx for understanding.
0 for Sven91:
youll never be the best player in this game
What is your point?
Neither you, nor Vicionia, nor I will be the best players, because losers are the best in this game.
BTW, "Lords of War and Money" is more appropriate name for this game than "Heroes of War and Money", because approximately
"Lords of War and Money" = "Losers of War and Money" :) |
They are losers, because they lose more battles than win.
Why losers are given much more power than winners?
Was this game created for losing battles?
"Losers" are going to crush you down simple because of the faction skill.
Why? Well... I call it game possibility ) Does anybody prevent you from gathering faction skill points?
I can't answer the last question, by why should someone change his/her gamestyle, just because of the fact that you (or some other players) don't like it? |
Rrr...some stupid mistakes of mine, sorry ^^
simply*
but why*
etc. |
| for dArtagnan: basicly losers can gather 'free' diamonds from any tournament on low levels. They will beat any opponent in duels, with some luck - 3 of them at once in blindfold. You think this is not cheat? Or, you do it yourself? |
Or, you do it yourself?
I play for fun. )
You think this is not cheat?
No, it's not.
Have you ever tried gathering only FSP for a LONG time? Like.. 1,5 months at least? I bet you haven't. ) |
Well, if 'only hunt and merc' counts - I tried for about 3. But on 5+ the disbalance is not so hardcore. And on 4 and below those 'gathering' must be restricted.
I play for fun. )
That means 'yes'. You're just protecting YOUR stile of game, not the good one. So nice of you... |
| *style omg... |
| [Post deleted by moderator dArtagnan // Oops. Quote error] |
Well, if 'only hunt and merc' counts - I tried for about 3
I think, you've missed the point.. )
The guys, really gathering FSP, have no benefit from hunts or mercenarie quests. Because they never (or nearly never) win.
That means 'yes'.
Prove it. =)
You're just protecting YOUR stile of game,
Describe my gamestyle to me, please. ) With the battle logs, if you don't mind )
not the good one
I beg your pardon, but are you the one who is deciding, which gamestyle is the "good" one? ) Cool, I didn't know that. Sorry ^^ |
I suppose it wasn't ment to get a really great Character by loosing 99% of your fights intensionally.
If u think thats just a way of playing then its simply wrong.
Its Bugusing(or using weak rules to your benefit (Powergaming)) at its worst and as such it should IMHO allways be looked at as something disgusting.
Because its just that- disgusting. |
The guys, really gathering FSP, have no benefit from hunts or mercenarie quests.
Those make only 10% of average income. 90% is working and sometimes trading. So it doesnt change much here. And the exp gained in merc and hunts is... well... there's almost no exp on middle levels.
I beg your pardon, but are you the one who is deciding, which gamestyle is the "good" one?
Its you who missed the point) Not the gamestyle you think of as good, fair, matching the idea of LoWM, but the one you use. Feel the difference?
Describe my gamestyle to me, please. ) With the battle logs, if you don't mind )
Please name all your 'mults' here and on .ru, unofficial ones(more than 3, or from another IP, or this kind of thing) - to PM. Then I'll try. Maybe :P
Prove it. =)
I shouldn't ;P |
| Oh, btw, you can ban me for posting from multiple accounts as a tool in the discussion ^^ |
Oh, btw, you can ban me for posting from multiple accounts as a tool in the discussion ^^
Ask the Empress for it, if you desire to be a "good" player ^^
If u think thats just a way of playing then its simply wrongIf u think thats just a way of playing then its simply wrong.
Its Bugusing(or using weak rules to your benefit (Powergaming)) at its worst and as such it should IMHO allways be looked at as something disgusting.
Why? It's definitely not a bug. It's not prohibited by Game Rules. = It's legitimate.
Not the gamestyle you think of as good, fair, matching the idea of LoWM, but the one you use.
I won't denie it, I've missed a lot, by simply waiting for tournaments to come. But I haven't wasted time by loosing hunts for 0,49 FSP. ) Feel the difference?
Please name all your 'mults' here and on .ru
No mults. ) Char links - you have them.
Oh, btw, you can ban me for posting from multiple accounts as a tool in the discussion ^^
Ask the Empress, not me. |
I shouldn't ;P
Well, you could... just to protect your words....maybe... |
Although I really dont see the point of this debate (after all if someone choses to stay in a low level to get really high faction for ever what does it bother me?)
Here is a simple possible solution:
if wins are 90% + of overal battles player gets +1 attack
if loses are 90% + of overal battles player gets -1 defense
for every 2.5% after the 90% player gets extra +1 or -1 accordingly.... |
